Today's hottest deals

Asrock X870 Pro RS WiFi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 301%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 405%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics287% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsrock X870 Pro RS WiFi  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X870 Pro RS WiFi
Memory21 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 08 '24 at 15:38
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$600
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 68.2
1-Core 204
2-Core 411
116% 228 Pts
4-Core 794
8-Core 1,559
139% 1,176 Pts
64-Core 3,642
225% 3,642 Pts
Poor: 112%
This bench: 109%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
ASRock(1849 5302) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 24.9.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Lighting 385
Reflection 483
Parallax 791
313% 553 fps
MRender 563
Gravity 321
Splatting 477
372% 454 fps
Poor: 221%
This bench: 287%
Great: 294%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
625GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 938 903 912 906 989 989 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 800
Write 1,275
Mixed 914
SusWrite 939
223% 982 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 54.3
215% 84.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1064
DQ Write 1,377
DQ Mixed 1,269
944% 1,237 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 209%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$98
232GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1351 310 311 311 311 312 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
281% Outstanding
Read 2,441
Write 1472
Mixed 1,282
SusWrite 484
314% 1420 MB/s
4K Read 66.5
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 89.3
321% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 1,504
DQ Mixed 1,010
829% 1,163 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 281%
Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
682GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 490 491 491 491 491 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 490
Mixed 471
SusWrite 491
111% 491 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 61.7
212% 77.3 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 368
277% 371 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 133%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
385GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 193 193 193 193 193 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 376
Write 364
Mixed 355
SusWrite 193
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 93
4K Mixed 53.5
179% 62.3 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 222
168% 225 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 133%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 997GB
742GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 192 192 192 192 193 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 375
Write 364
Mixed 325
SusWrite 192
71% 314 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 92.1
4K Mixed 45.7
158% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 221
166% 223 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
233GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 485 394 290 291 291 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 491
Mixed 464
SusWrite 373
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 65.1
224% 80.2 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 367
277% 371 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 130%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX5M2X6200C36 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
171% Outstanding
MC Read 90.6
MC Write 46.8
MC Mixed 57.1
185% 64.8 GB/s
SC Read 34.8
SC Write 43.2
SC Mixed 39.1
112% 39 GB/s
Latency 44.3
90% 44.3 ns
Poor: 136%
This bench: 171%
Great: 212%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 52 180 31.5" 1280 720 ACR0D1D XZ322QU V3
Typical X870 Pro RS WiFi Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 309%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 295%
UFO

System: Asrock X870 Pro RS WiFi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback