Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706ICB_FA706ICB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706ICB_FA706ICB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA706ICB
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 08 '24 at 06:45
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60% Above average
Memory 78.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 173
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 294
34% 264 Pts
64-Core 493
30% 493 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 16BD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.14
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.93% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 7.1
3% 6.1 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 7.8
6% 6.87 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 3.93%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 561 580 558 301 98 136 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Read 854
Write 856
Mixed 780
SusWrite 372
161% 716 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 32.2
112% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 84.5
DQ Mixed 162
115% 150 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
52.4% Above average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 18.6
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 144 17.3" 1280 720 AUO8294
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706ICB_FA706ICB Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706ICB_FA706ICB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback