Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
1 month ago, 10 days ago.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A68M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 07 '24 at 23:46
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Memory 41.9
1-Core 51.7
2-Core 98.2
37% 63.9 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 161
22% 160 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
ASRock(1849 1313) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
4.36% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 9.2
4% 6.87 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 6.3
5% 5.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.36%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
EYOTA-128GB 128GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HCS1A25C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 148 45 55 45 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 425
Write 332
Mixed 326
SusWrite 110
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 12.7
91% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 17.3
52% 108 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX316C10F/8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 5.9
19% 6.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 37 7 60 18.5" 1280 720 SAM0867 SMS19A100
Typical FM2A68M-HD+ Builds (Compare 226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback