Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191014
Uptime13.7 Days
Run DateOct 07 '24 at 12:16
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 60%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 77
1-Core 88.7
2-Core 154
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 503
48% 396 Pts
64-Core 706
44% 706 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 2489) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 170
Parallax 159
141% 167 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 134
Splatting 115
115% 144 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 126%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SDM9SI480A 480GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1022A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 362 381 203 109 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 456
Write 399
Mixed 386
SusWrite 256
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 24.5
108% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 40.8
84% 166 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 97%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$23
47GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 93 76 58 60 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 305
Write 355
Mixed 10
SusWrite 113
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 20
70% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 0.5
80% 191 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 92%
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB
193GB free
Firmware: H190117H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 419 411 408 379 379 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 444
Mixed 384
SusWrite 402
95% 420 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 32.6
133% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 311
238% 323 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 313%
Ultra M8V 512GB
100GB free
Firmware: H190117H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 417 421 430 442 427 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 467
Mixed 435
SusWrite 425
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 38.7
140% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 313
235% 314 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 100%
Great: 120%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 1TB
927GB free, PID 0906
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 141 138 140 139 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 112
Write 108
Mixed 20
SusWrite 139
126% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
37% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$69
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 29
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 22
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 20 144 24" 1920 1017 GSM5B73 24GL600F
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,516 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $318
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback