Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics67.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-QD3
Memory18.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221010
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 06 '24 at 13:04
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 76.6
1-Core 78.7
2-Core 150
60% 102 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 574
52% 435 Pts
64-Core 1,193
74% 1,193 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$299
AMD(1002 0E36) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.9.1
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.8% Good
Lighting 84.1
Reflection 131
Parallax 162
68% 126 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 90.2
Splatting 0.2
66% 94.1 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 93%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 480GB 480GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A30C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 77 35 2.8 4.7 4 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 465
Write 158
Mixed 236
SusWrite 40
49% 225 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 10.9
113% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 14.1
62% 140 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
19GB free
Firmware: KC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 80 82 82 82 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 104
Write 96.9
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 81.9
63% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36KSF2G72PZ-1G6E1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.2% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 14.7
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 30 32" 1280 720 CTV0030 CTV
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback