Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics72.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive343% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '24 at 20:37
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$139
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Memory 90.5
1-Core 142
2-Core 284
94% 172 Pts
4-Core 559
8-Core 1,080
97% 820 Pts
64-Core 1,468
91% 1,468 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$218
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 560.81
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.2% Very good
Lighting 90
Reflection 90.1
Parallax 83.7
73% 87.9 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 78.6
Splatting 71.6
70% 87.7 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$130
575GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2110 2155 2149 2175 2169 1399 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
343% Outstanding
Read 2,547
Write 2,179
Mixed 1,367
SusWrite 2,026
455% 2,030 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 58.1
218% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,348
DQ Write 933
DQ Mixed 1,019
794% 1,100 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 343%
Great: 370%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$76
272GB free
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 416 417 417 417 417 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 394
Write 427
Mixed 383
SusWrite 416
92% 405 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 55.5
181% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 150
127% 187 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 107%
Great: 125%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$55
896GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 123 123 123 124 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 154
Write 163
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 123
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
168% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 41.5
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 40.6
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 29.1
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 40.5
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 102%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 27" 1280 720 AUS27ED PA278CGV
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,911 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $895
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback