Today's hottest deals

Asrock X670E Taichi Carrara

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics286% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemAsrock X670E Taichi Carrara  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X670E Taichi Carrara
Memory54.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230426
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 29 '24 at 12:36
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$476
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 97.7
1-Core 194
2-Core 375
119% 222 Pts
4-Core 740
8-Core 1,291
123% 1,015 Pts
64-Core 1,732
107% 1,732 Pts
Poor: 110%
This bench: 118%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
ASRock(1849 5302) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 24.8.1
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
286% Outstanding
Lighting 382
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 851
311% 412 fps
MRender 578
Gravity 308
Splatting 478
372% 455 fps
Poor: 225%
This bench: 286%
Great: 292%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT2000T500SSD8 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P8CR002
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,009
Write 4,227
Mixed 2,866
825% 3,701 MB/s
4K Read 65.2
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 95.3
321% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,727
DQ Write 1,399
DQ Mixed 1,576
1,176% 1,568 MB/s
Poor: 234% Great: 684%
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 4TB-$280
3TB free
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,940
Write 4,035
Mixed 3,293
770% 3,422 MB/s
4K Read 78
4K Write 198
4K Mixed 110
363% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,834
DQ Write 1,474
DQ Mixed 1,670
1,246% 1,659 MB/s
Poor: 303% Great: 616%
Crucial T700 M.2 2TB-$270
2TB free
Firmware: PACR5103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,764
Write 7,720
Mixed 3,682
1,349% 6,055 MB/s
4K Read 74.6
4K Write 251
4K Mixed 117
396% 147 MB/s
DQ Read 1,848
DQ Write 1,378
DQ Mixed 1,694
1,244% 1,640 MB/s
Poor: 475% Great: 926%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DHX 6000 C30 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
223% Outstanding
MC Read 85.5
MC Write 74.9
MC Mixed 83.2
232% 81.2 GB/s
SC Read 71.4
SC Write 73.4
SC Mixed 67.5
202% 70.8 GB/s
Latency 49.3
81% 49.3 ns
Poor: 126%
This bench: 223%
Great: 205%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 55 60 23" 1280 720 SAM0526 SyncMaster
Typical X670E Taichi Carrara Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 298%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 375%
UFO

System: Asrock X670E Taichi Carrara

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,845
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback