Today's hottest deals

MSI Z170A GAMING M3 (MS-7978)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemMSI MS-7978
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M3 (MS-7978)  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '24 at 00:03
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$130
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
36.5% Below average
Memory 57.9
1-Core 23.4
2-Core 44.9
30% 42.1 Pts
4-Core 84.4
8-Core 127
13% 106 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 561.09
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.1% Above average
Lighting 73.7
Reflection 70.3
Parallax 69.3
60% 71.1 fps
MRender 60.4
Gravity 71.8
Splatting 57.4
51% 63.2 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-force 240GB 240GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0218A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 331 358 361 366 373 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 438
Write 381
Mixed 372
SusWrite 354
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 26.8
4K Mixed 17.3
66% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 46.3
62% 113 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 99%
Kingston DT 101 G2 4GB
3GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 5.4 5.5 5.3 4.9 5.3 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 100
Write 8.9
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 5.1
26% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
44% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
44.7% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 18.5
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 23.9" 1280 720 SAM707D LF24T35
Typical Z170A GAMING M3 (MS-7978) Builds (Compare 2,433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M3 (MS-7978) - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $534
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback