Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M1605YA_D1605YA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M1605YA_D1605YA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M1605YA
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240314
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 28 '24 at 19:07
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 37.1
1-Core 90.6
2-Core 181
53% 103 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 678
68% 550 Pts
64-Core 1,049
65% 1,049 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 29DD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.46.24
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
9.66% Terrible
Lighting 8.6
Reflection 9.7
Parallax 29.1
7% 15.8 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 25.3
Splatting 17.2
15% 18 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.66%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU 512GB
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC70W1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,025
Write 846
Mixed 837
201% 903 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 43.8
141% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 541
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 412
292% 381 MB/s
Poor: 95% Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE Hynix HMAG68EXNSA051N 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.9% Average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 15.7
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 20.1
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 16" 1280 720 CMN1618
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M1605YA_D1605YA Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M1605YA_D1605YA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback