Today's hottest deals

Pcspecialist Recoil VI 17

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive338% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemPcspecialist Recoil VI 17  (all builds)
MotherboardTongFang GM7AGxN
Memory41.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230216
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 27 '24 at 17:20
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 74
1-Core 184
2-Core 322
103% 193 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 954
95% 773 Pts
64-Core 1,730
107% 1,730 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti (Laptop)
Device(1D05 1176) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3734
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 227
Parallax 151
132% 180 fps
MRender 201
Gravity 160
Splatting 151
137% 171 fps
Poor: 101%
This bench: 127%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1807 2103 1328 1297 1311 1521 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
338% Outstanding
Read 3,710
Write 2,534
Mixed 2,484
SusWrite 1,561
574% 2,572 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 94.3
4K Mixed 70
218% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 842
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 558
418% 572 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 338%
Great: 445%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMS5X32G2A48C40A2-PC 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
145% Outstanding
MC Read 59.4
MC Write 53.7
MC Mixed 56.9
162% 56.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 44.1
SC Mixed 28.7
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 145%
Great: 163%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 25 195 13 60 27" 1280 720 DEL4231 DELL U2722DE
Typical Recoil VI 17 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Pcspecialist Recoil VI 17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback