Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B550M K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics43% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive346% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550M K  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '24 at 18:34
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 86.9
1-Core 141
2-Core 279
93% 169 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 922
90% 738 Pts
64-Core 1,112
69% 1,112 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
EVGA(3842 0781) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 474.64
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43% Average
Lighting 50.3
Reflection 57.1
Parallax 65.5
41% 57.6 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 59.9
Splatting 49.6
47% 58.4 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 43%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP600 PRO LPX 500GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3455 2256 822 753 703 769 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
346% Outstanding
Read 2,419
Write 3,554
Mixed 2,614
SusWrite 1,460
568% 2,512 MB/s
4K Read 65.6
4K Write 210
4K Mixed 107
347% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,373
DQ Write 965
DQ Mixed 1,199
887% 1,179 MB/s
Poor: 201%
This bench: 346%
Great: 426%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MLX4C320GJJM8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
89.2% Excellent
MC Read 36
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 34.9
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 36.2
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM0D2C C24F390
Typical GA-B550M K Builds (Compare 409 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550M K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $409
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback