Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507NUR_FA507NUR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507NUR_FA507NUR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA507NUR
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '24 at 17:41
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS
FP7r2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 70.2
1-Core 159
2-Core 317
95% 182 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 922
88% 727 Pts
64-Core 994
62% 994 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4050 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 1F13) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 561.09
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 189
Parallax 121
110% 148 fps
MRender 168
Gravity 102
Splatting 85.5
93% 118 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDKBA512QFM-1BD1AABGB 512GB
285GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1142 1199 1341 1440 968 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 1,236
Write 1,368
Mixed 1,032
SusWrite 1,028
263% 1,166 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 20.7
104% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 540
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 641
417% 492 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 162%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOL 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
72.7% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 25.3
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 22.7
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0B70 NE156FHM-NX6
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507NUR_FA507NUR Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507NUR_FA507NUR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback