Today's hottest deals

Firebat_computer T8_Plus

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFirebat_computer T8_Plus  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '24 at 15:53
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
50.8% Above average
Memory 44.5
1-Core 105
2-Core 198
61% 116 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 328
44% 328 Pts
64-Core 325
20% 325 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5537
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
3.08% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 3.9
3% 4.47 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.08%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ256HBJD-00BL1 256GB
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L1QFXM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 877 869 772 619 267 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,276
Write 1,047
Mixed 1,024
SusWrite 593
221% 985 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 63
207% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 885
DQ Write 671
DQ Mixed 729
558% 762 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 186%
Great: 214%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 4x2GB
4 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.5
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 14.3
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 54.6" 1280 720 XXX2851 Beyond TV
Typical T8_Plus Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Firebat_computer T8_Plus

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback