PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds) |
Memory | 19.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200713 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Sep 25 '24 at 16:44 |
Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
Run User | LTU-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
88.2%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung MZ7KH1T9HAJR-00005 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXM7304Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 422 428 433 431 430 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Transcend JM3200HLE-32G 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
|
51.7%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 70 | 58 | 60 | 23.5" | 1280 720 | AOC2401 24G1WG4 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $89Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 527x |
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $159Bench 86%, 635,419 samples | 504x |
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $130Bench 96%, 383,420 samples | 368x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3070Nvidia $470Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 245x |
RTX 3080Nvidia $751Bench 187%, 424,051 samples | 191x |
RX 5700-XTAMD $266Bench 98%, 254,908 samples | 166x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $694 |