Today's hottest deals

Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory19.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200713
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 25 '24 at 16:44
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$335
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 74.3
1-Core 140
2-Core 280
88% 165 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 998
93% 772 Pts
64-Core 2,158
134% 2,158 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.1% Poor
Lighting 34.2
Reflection 38
Parallax 35.4
28% 35.9 fps
MRender 35.5
Gravity 36
Splatting 25
26% 32.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7KH1T9HAJR-00005 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXM7304Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 422 428 433 431 430 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 446
Mixed 437
SusWrite 411
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 46.3
156% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 205
154% 206 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 103%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM3200HLE-32G 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
51.7% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 17.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 16.5
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 23.5" 1280 720 AOC2401 24G1WG4
Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,960 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $694
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback