Today's hottest deals

Mm-vision Computer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 172%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMm-vision Computer  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS (WI-FI)
Memory57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '24 at 12:39
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900KF-$249
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 90.9
1-Core 152
2-Core 305
99% 183 Pts
4-Core 608
8-Core 1,208
107% 908 Pts
64-Core 2,040
126% 2,040 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$375
Asus(1043 894D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 561.09
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Lighting 214
Reflection 194
Parallax 213
174% 207 fps
MRender 299
Gravity 167
Splatting 124
152% 197 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 154%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,451
Write 2,140
Mixed 1,565
456% 2,052 MB/s
4K Read 54.3
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 69.7
227% 76.1 MB/s
DQ Read 934
DQ Write 665
DQ Mixed 825
610% 808 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNW020T8 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1530 1446 1503 1453 1448 1443 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 1510
Write 1,543
Mixed 1086
SusWrite 1,470
316% 1,402 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 67.6
226% 78.3 MB/s
DQ Read 917
DQ Write 692
DQ Mixed 567
488% 725 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 256%
Great: 302%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
353GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 104 105 105 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 120
Write 98.7
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 104
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMWX16GC3000C16W4D 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2000 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 28.8
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 39.5
SC Mixed 29.2
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 100 34" 1280 720 HPN3364 HP ENVY 34
Typical Computer Builds (Compare 1,760 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

System: Mm-vision Computer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 134% - Outstanding Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback