Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics75.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive479% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '24 at 03:42
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 172
2-Core 329
107% 198 Pts
4-Core 643
8-Core 1,252
112% 948 Pts
64-Core 1,598
99% 1,598 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 106%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$244
Nvidia(10DE 2507) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.2% Very good
Lighting 102
Reflection 84.5
Parallax 89.9
83% 92.2 fps
MRender 84
Gravity 72.2
Splatting 65.2
59% 73.8 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 78%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV3S1000G 1TB
873GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ERFK1N.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3898 4027 4003 4175 4144 4168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
479% Outstanding
Read 2,560
Write 4,315
Mixed 3,182
SusWrite 4,069
803% 3,532 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 81.8
259% 88.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,412
DQ Write 724
DQ Mixed 1,226
869% 1,121 MB/s
Poor: 256%
This bench: 479%
Great: 580%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 33.9
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 30.7
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 38.1
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 180 27" 1280 720 ACR0BDD VG271U M3
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 8,275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $650
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback