Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 83JC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics73.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83JC  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory19.9 GB free of 28 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240304
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 24 '24 at 22:57
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 71.5
1-Core 147
2-Core 268
88% 162 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 647
71% 559 Pts
64-Core 634
39% 634 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
Legend(17AA 3E3C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2197 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Lighting 102
Reflection 85.4
Parallax 93.8
83% 93.6 fps
MRender 64.5
Gravity 74.3
Splatting 67.6
56% 68.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 75%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDKCD512QFM-1BD1AABLA 512GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1002V3LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1313 1330 1364 482 155 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 1,234
Write 1,420
Mixed 1,151
SusWrite 788
259% 1,148 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 29.3
140% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 624
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 579
385% 472 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 158%
Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSB3400KB06IVF-4800 CT16G56C46S5.M8G1 28GB
4800, 5600 MHz
12288, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
116% Outstanding
MC Read 42.6
MC Write 48.2
MC Mixed 40.5
125% 43.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 42.2
SC Mixed 26.1
89% 31 GB/s
Latency 96.1
42% 96.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 22: 0P 2R 0G 12B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 14% 98 97 56 144 15.5" 1280 720 CSW150F
Typical 83JC Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

System: Lenovo 83JC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback