Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 17-cp2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.63% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Laptop 17-cp2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8A81
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240201
Uptime13 Days
Run DateSep 23 '24 at 19:19
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 7320U Graphics
FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 54.7
1-Core 111
2-Core 210
67% 125 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 485
53% 418 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 8A81) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.8.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
6.63% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 11.6
Parallax 11.2
5% 9.67 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 17.8
10% 11 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.63%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-2006 512GB
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 763 794 729 793 824 832 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 829
Write 708
Mixed 722
SusWrite 789
172% 762 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 56.8
4K Mixed 38.8
131% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 645
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 452
324% 429 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 141%
Great: 429%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB0BM-MGCP 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
67.5% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 24.6
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 26.2
SC Mixed 16.8
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 199
20% 199 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 17.3" 1280 720 BOE0953
Typical Laptop 17-cp2xxx Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 17-cp2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback