Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X670E AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 124%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics382% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670E AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '24 at 18:07
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$593
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 216
2-Core 433
130% 248 Pts
4-Core 820
8-Core 1,695
148% 1,258 Pts
64-Core 3,841
238% 3,841 Pts
Poor: 113%
This bench: 124%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,802
Asus(1043 889C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 561.09
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
382% Outstanding
Lighting 606
Reflection 593
Parallax 736
494% 645 fps
MRender 528
Gravity 582
Splatting 305
369% 472 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 382%
Great: 402%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$118
822GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,911
Write 3,176
Mixed 3,009
679% 3,032 MB/s
4K Read 69.7
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 85.2
286% 96.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,895
DQ Write 1,417
DQ Mixed 1,618
1,220% 1,643 MB/s
Poor: 266% Great: 477%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$95
831GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 522
Write 495
Mixed 463
110% 493 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 63.6
217% 77.6 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 369
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 137%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$95
835GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 520
Write 494
Mixed 471
110% 495 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 64.6
222% 78.6 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 364
276% 370 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 137%
Kingston SFYRD2000G 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: EIFK31.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,982
Write 3,860
Mixed 3,371
765% 3,405 MB/s
4K Read 61.3
4K Write 222
4K Mixed 105
345% 129 MB/s
DQ Read 2,159
DQ Write 1,392
DQ Mixed 1,852
1,360% 1,801 MB/s
Poor: 270% Great: 601%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$171
969GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,604
Write 2,136
Mixed 1,846
488% 2,195 MB/s
4K Read 63.3
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 87.6
306% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,989
DQ Write 1,489
DQ Mixed 1,689
1,276% 1,723 MB/s
Poor: 223% Great: 435%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
23GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 38.6
Write 28.9
Mixed 21.5
36% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.1
99% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-7800J3646H16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 8000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
316% Outstanding
MC Read 193
MC Write 75.2
MC Mixed 103
354% 124 GB/s
SC Read 53.3
SC Write 77.5
SC Mixed 71.1
192% 67.3 GB/s
Latency 59.4
67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 144%
This bench: 316%
Great: 368%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 6 144 34.8" 3440 1369 GSM7769 34GP950G
Typical GA-X670E AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670E AORUS MASTER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $2,421
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback