PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 22.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Cyberpowerpc C SERIES (all builds) |
Motherboard | MSI B360M Xtreme |
Memory | 1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190508 |
Uptime | 2.4 Days |
Run Date | Sep 22 '24 at 14:17 |
Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 32% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
74.7%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 560.81
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
22.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$32
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 3.8 35 3.2 17 9.5 MB/s
|
37.4%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
317GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 127 128 124 126 125 MB/s
|
76%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown DDR4 3000 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
32.3%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 70 | 58 | 75 | 21.5" | 1280 720 | ACR06AB SB220Q |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 2,463x |
Core i7-8700Intel $160Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 722x |
Core i7-9700FIntel $273Bench 92%, 54,980 samples | 382x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1660Nvidia $209Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 1,380x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $225Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 563x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 337x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $326 |