Today's hottest deals

Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCyberpowerpc C SERIES  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI B360M Xtreme
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190508
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateSep 22 '24 at 14:17
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 111
2-Core 216
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 439
54% 414 Pts
64-Core 540
33% 540 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 560.81
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22.5% Poor
Lighting 28.4
Reflection 25.9
Parallax 25.2
23% 26.5 fps
MRender 23.5
Gravity 31.4
Splatting 23.8
21% 26.2 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$32
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 3.8 35 3.2 17 9.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 384
Write 320
Mixed 269
SusWrite 40.5
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 14
52% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 50.9
DQ Mixed 37.6
40% 67.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
317GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 127 128 124 126 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
76% Very good
Read 139
Write 137
Mixed 79.6
SusWrite 126
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3000 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
32.3% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 9.4
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 8.9
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 75 21.5" 1280 720 ACR06AB SB220Q
Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $326
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback