Today's hottest deals

MSI X670E GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E16)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E16
MotherboardMSI X670E GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E16)  (all builds)
Memory52.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '24 at 20:36
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900-$376
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 80.8
1-Core 210
2-Core 412
121% 234 Pts
4-Core 820
8-Core 1,492
139% 1,156 Pts
64-Core 2,869
178% 2,869 Pts
Poor: 98%
This bench: 117%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Ryzen 7000 (iGPU)
MSI(1462 7E16) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.8.1
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
8.11% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 13.5
6% 11.8 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 7
Splatting 21.7
12% 13.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.11%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot M.2 P300 512GB
360GB free (System drive)
Firmware: APF1M3R1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,289
Write 2,203
Mixed 1,592
382% 1,695 MB/s
4K Read 51.7
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 73.3
254% 93.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,298
DQ Write 1,503
DQ Mixed 1386
1,048% 1,396 MB/s
Poor: 95% Great: 287%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G48C40U5.C16A1 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
160% Outstanding
MC Read 64
MC Write 52.5
MC Mixed 56
164% 57.5 GB/s
SC Read 52.3
SC Write 59.5
SC Mixed 53.1
157% 55 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 160%
Great: 169%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 48.9" 3840 1009 SAM0F21 C49J89x
Typical X670E GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E16) Builds (Compare 105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 419%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X670E GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E16)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $2,431
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback