Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics86.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star Please change product name
MotherboardMSI MS-16V2  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '24 at 11:56
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 87.3
1-Core 132
2-Core 262
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 811
79% 650 Pts
64-Core 1,174
73% 1,174 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super Mobile Max-Q)
MSI(1462 12C6) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5734
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.5% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 127
Parallax 112
86% 115 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 98.8
Splatting 95.1
88% 109 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 96%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256G B 256GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 306 31 29 30 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 371
Write 336
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 123
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 13.7
4K Mixed 9
44% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 32.8
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 1.7
26% 58.2 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43EB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.4% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 23.6
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 24
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 30: 0P 3R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
30% 30% 40 210 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 SHP14A1
Typical MS-16V2 Builds (Compare 298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback