Today's hottest deals

Samsung 550XED

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSamsung 550XED  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP550XED-KF2BR
Memory0.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240819
Uptime5.7 Days
Run DateSep 20 '24 at 12:35
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
48.5% Average
Memory 42.1
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 179
56% 105 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 587
52% 440 Pts
64-Core 836
52% 836 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C878) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 18.2
Parallax 13.5
10% 14.4 fps
MRender 17.5
Gravity 23.3
Splatting 14.7
15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL4-8D256 256GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EV82002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 520 387 393 389 412 396 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 1,329
Write 1164
Mixed 968
SusWrite 416
217% 969 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 15.5
136% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 722
DQ Write 421
DQ Mixed 641
458% 595 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 142%
Great: 220%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HEMA851S6DJR6N-XN 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
78.3% Very good
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 29.3
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 16.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 52 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0A06
Typical 550XED Builds (Compare 140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 550XED

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback