Today's hottest deals

Asus H97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140502
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateSep 18 '24 at 17:45
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$65
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 90.2
2-Core 173
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 338
45% 338 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$285
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 165
Reflection 129
Parallax 152
135% 149 fps
MRender 193
Gravity 131
Splatting 106
113% 143 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 122%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 240GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM22.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 273 270 273 206 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 346
Write 458
Mixed 316
SusWrite 241
77% 340 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 34.9
121% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 170
152% 229 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 99%
Ardor GAMING m.2 NVME 1024Gb AL1288 1TB
241GB free
Firmware: H230306a Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 542 590 606 648 517 275 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 684
Write 650
Mixed 597
SusWrite 530
138% 615 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 56.8
184% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 768
DQ Write 665
DQ Mixed 688
523% 707 MB/s
Poor: 174%
This bench: 149%
Great: 355%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$23
159GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 122 120 123 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 141
Write 109
Mixed 79
SusWrite 121
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.7% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 8.8
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.3
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 2 60 21.5" 1920 1017 AOC2281 2281W
Typical H97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,010 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-PLUS - $111

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $290
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback