Today's hottest deals

MSI B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E26)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E26
MotherboardMSI B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E26)  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240522
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateSep 18 '24 at 10:35
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 77.3
1-Core 189
2-Core 379
112% 215 Pts
4-Core 758
8-Core 1,205
121% 981 Pts
64-Core 1,236
76% 1,236 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 109%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Zotac(19DA 1375) 2GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33% Below average
Lighting 42
Reflection 46.2
Parallax 40.7
34% 43 fps
MRender 34.8
Gravity 41.7
Splatting 36.2
31% 37.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV3S1000G 1TB
883GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ERFK1N.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,911
Write 4,942
Mixed 3,396
846% 3,750 MB/s
4K Read 69.2
4K Write 231
4K Mixed 102
358% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 1,688
DQ Write 1,060
DQ Mixed 1,511
1,090% 1,420 MB/s
Poor: 300% Great: 553%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
130GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 523
Write 498
Mixed 456
110% 492 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 66
226% 80.8 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 371
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
OCZ Trion 100 120GB-$60
21GB free
Firmware: SAFM11.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 521
Write 91.6
Mixed 204
59% 272 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 95.2
4K Mixed 29.1
130% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 162
137% 204 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
558GB free
Firmware: CC43
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 158
Write 107
Mixed 81.2
86% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$70
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 183
Write 134
Mixed 95.2
102% 137 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.1
478% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF556C36-8 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
126% Outstanding
MC Read 50.2
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 42.8
125% 43.9 GB/s
SC Read 46.8
SC Write 52.4
SC Mixed 49
141% 49.4 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 126%
Great: 165%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 15 50 34" 3440 1369 SAM0F72 S34J55x
Typical B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E26) Builds (Compare 487 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 245%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 250%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E26)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 122% - Outstanding Total price: $1,286
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback