Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-17F4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star WF75 10TI
MotherboardMSI MS-17F4  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201225
Uptime6 Days
Run DateSep 17 '24 at 15:50
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 84.4
1-Core 130
2-Core 259
87% 158 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 811
80% 652 Pts
64-Core 1,003
62% 1,003 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 88%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12BE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.76% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 8.1
5% 7.77 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 11.1
8% 9.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.76%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G-1032 512GB
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11111000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1153 985 989 990 990 992 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 2,010
Write 2,086
Mixed 1,682
SusWrite 1,016
382% 1,699 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 62.2
206% 72.6 MB/s
DQ Read 985
DQ Write 610
DQ Mixed 773
582% 789 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 242%
Great: 264%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43EB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 24.5
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 24.5
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 144 17.2" 1280 720 CMN176E
Typical MS-17F4 Builds (Compare 840 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17F4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback