Today's hottest deals

Tulpar T7 V20.6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive288% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemTulpar T7 V20.6  (all builds)
MotherboardTULPAR T7 V20.6
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '24 at 17:51
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 71.3
1-Core 202
2-Core 402
115% 225 Pts
4-Core 792
8-Core 1,336
129% 1,064 Pts
64-Core 1956
121% 1956 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 110%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D05 1295) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4091
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
22% Poor
Lighting 25.8
Reflection 30.4
Parallax 29.6
21% 28.6 fps
MRender 27.8
Gravity 37.7
Splatting 24.2
24% 29.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Solidigm SSDPFKNU010TZ 1TB
901GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1755 2083 2066 2204 1783 804 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
288% Outstanding
Read 1,856
Write 2,038
Mixed 1,472
SusWrite 1,783
403% 1,787 MB/s
4K Read 56.8
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 74.3
248% 85.9 MB/s
DQ Read 843
DQ Write 416
DQ Mixed 791
544% 683 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 288%
Great: 365%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Wilk Elektronik S.A. GR3200S464L22/16G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 16.8
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 17.7
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 60 41 144 17.3" 1280 720 BOE0823
Typical T7 V20.6 Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO

System: Tulpar T7 V20.6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback