Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 253%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 326%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics221% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory55.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240802
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 14 '24 at 12:40
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X-$599
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 84.2
1-Core 228
2-Core 435
129% 249 Pts
4-Core 810
8-Core 1590
142% 1,200 Pts
64-Core 3,613
224% 3,613 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 118%
Great: 134%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,400
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 5125 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
221% Outstanding
Lighting 330
Reflection 306
Parallax 346
269% 328 fps
MRender 360
Gravity 269
Splatting 190
214% 273 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 221%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 960 1TB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A230W3UA
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,708
Write 4,658
Mixed 2,701
825% 3,689 MB/s
4K Read 62.8
4K Write 267
4K Mixed 97.8
362% 143 MB/s
DQ Read 2338
DQ Write 2,083
DQ Mixed 2,195
1,650% 2,205 MB/s
Poor: 224% Great: 514%
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP2000GM30002 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: STNSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3592 3649 3648 3417 3647 3715 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
483% Outstanding
Read 2025
Write 3,001
Mixed 2,210
SusWrite 3,612
617% 2,712 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 212
4K Mixed 81.1
284% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 2,217
DQ Write 2,011
DQ Mixed 2,106
1,582% 2,112 MB/s
Poor: 173%
This bench: 483%
Great: 502%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF564C32-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
269% Outstanding
MC Read 158
MC Write 74.7
MC Mixed 79.4
297% 104 GB/s
SC Read 56.8
SC Write 71
SC Mixed 63.3
182% 63.7 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 150%
This bench: 269%
Great: 276%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 360 27.4" 2560 1440 MSI3CD7 MPG271QX OLED
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 419%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $2,496
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback