Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
28 days ago, 21 days ago.
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-F8 GAMING
Memory58.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '24 at 03:58
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2686 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 89.7
2-Core 171
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 675
60% 506 Pts
64-Core 2,013
125% 2,013 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$299
PwrHis(1787 2413) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.10.37.10
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.8% Very good
Lighting 76.3
Reflection 119
Parallax 143
62% 113 fps
MRender 168
Gravity 82.7
Splatting 136
105% 129 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 93%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 1TB PRO 1TB
651GB free (System drive)
Firmware: APF1M3R1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1640 60 687 1354 67 816 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 1,074
Write 1,893
Mixed 1,369
SusWrite 770
290% 1,277 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 40.5
130% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 347
255% 337 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 146%
Great: 334%
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
154GB free
Firmware: UG450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 199 103 202 267 271 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 406
Write 351
Mixed 242
SusWrite 212
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 22.2
4K Mixed 9.1
45% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 89.4
DQ Mixed 41.9
48% 83.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40CB1-CRC 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
75.4% Very good
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 25.4
82% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.8
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 54 100 23.8" 1280 720 LEN66D7 G24e-20
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback