Today's hottest deals

Tulpar T5 V23.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics3.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive344% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemTulpar T5 V23.2  (all builds)
MotherboardTULPAR T5 V23.2
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230802
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '24 at 18:25
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12650H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Memory 66.2
1-Core 194
2-Core 382
109% 214 Pts
4-Core 695
8-Core 1,209
115% 952 Pts
64-Core 1,657
102% 1,657 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 A552) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 32.0.101.5768
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.62% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 4.9
3% 4.3 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 6
4% 5.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 3.62%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-PX600-1K0-80 1TB
877GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFMH0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3046 1273 1273 1272 1270 1267 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
344% Outstanding
Read 1,745
Write 3,306
Mixed 2,302
SusWrite 1,567
506% 2,230 MB/s
4K Read 67.8
4K Write 201
4K Mixed 98.2
335% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,421
DQ Write 1,947
DQ Mixed 1,593
1,229% 1,653 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 344%
Great: 407%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Wilk Elektronik S.A. GR3200S464L22/16G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
52.5% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 17.5
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 46: 0P 5R 5G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
46% 35% 46 217 58 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1556 N156HMA-GA1
Typical T5 V23.2 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Tulpar T5 V23.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback