Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H87N-WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics85.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H87N-WIFI  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150818
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 12 '24 at 15:28
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 70%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4430-$124
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 82.2
1-Core 67.8
2-Core 121
56% 90.3 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 211
26% 201 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Nvidia(10DE 12FE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 561.09
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.6% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 89.9
Parallax 98.3
85% 97.4 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 103
Splatting 89.5
87% 110 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 162 133 122 124 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 453
Write 425
Mixed 348
SusWrite 160
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 41.2
132% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 308
236% 323 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$150
208GB free
Firmware: CC71
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 78 78 77 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 78.5
Write 82
Mixed 49
SusWrite 77.2
53% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
16GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 116 114 134 87 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 107
Write 118
Mixed 88.2
SusWrite 110
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-037.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 16.4
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 15.1
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 207 31 60 15.5" 1280 720 LDR1560 CFORCE
Typical GA-H87N-WIFI Builds (Compare 169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H87N-WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $133
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback