Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2V DDR3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2V DDR3-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151030
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 12 '24 at 10:46
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$45
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 187
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 284
38% 284 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
MSI(1462 328B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Lighting 72.1
Reflection 74.8
Parallax 70.1
59% 72.3 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 72.1
Splatting 67.4
56% 68.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 56 75 73 40 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 431
Write 296
Mixed 104
SusWrite 76.5
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 27.9
84% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 174
158% 237 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 85%
PNY 500GB SATA SSD 500GB
410GB free
Firmware: W0925A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 382 384 389 397 396 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 378
Mixed 378
SusWrite 387
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 29.7
129% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 52.4
100% 196 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 101%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$35
866GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 180 172 172 168 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 167
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 172
99% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
126% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C16 1315 CT102464BD160B.M16 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
57.4% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 18.8
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 18.4
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 22" 1280 720 CMO2228 CMC 22 W
Typical GA-H110M-S2V DDR3-CF Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2V DDR3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback