Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics82.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190527
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 11 '24 at 00:48
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$126
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Memory 92.1
1-Core 121
2-Core 239
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 675
72% 577 Pts
64-Core 686
42% 686 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.2% Excellent
Lighting 120
Reflection 136
Parallax 121
98% 125 fps
MRender 94.7
Gravity 122
Splatting 0.2
52% 72.4 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 495
Write 415
Mixed 12.2
67% 308 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.4
27% 7.13 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 102%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
32GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 110 115 109 114 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 471
Write 458
Mixed 339
SusWrite 122
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 19.3
123% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 140
137% 224 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 111%
Samsung 840 EVO 120GB
291GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 191 72 71 71 71 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 502
Write 477
Mixed 436
SusWrite 156
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 90.8
4K Mixed 49.7
166% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 352
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Silicon-Power SP008GBLFU240B02 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
75.4% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 22.7
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 23.1
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 51 60 31.5" 1280 720 VSCDE35 VX3258 series
Typical TUF B360M-E GAMING Builds (Compare 1,170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $202
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $315Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback