Today's hottest deals

Geekom IT12

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics18.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive314% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGeekom IT12  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault IT12
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240409
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 10 '24 at 17:15
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 70.5
1-Core 177
2-Core 347
103% 198 Pts
4-Core 623
8-Core 966
98% 795 Pts
64-Core 1,464
91% 1,464 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5537
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 26.6
Parallax 25.8
18% 24.7 fps
MRender 23.7
Gravity 34.5
Splatting 20.9
21% 26.4 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Wodposit NVMe SSD 1TB
816GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFM01.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2725 2811 2815 1600 705 702 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 1,311
Write 2,864
Mixed 1,577
SusWrite 1,893
435% 1,912 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 82.5
288% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,164
DQ Write 1,380
DQ Mixed 1,206
927% 1,250 MB/s
Poor: 244%
This bench: 314%
Great: 417%
Nt-1tb 2242 1TB
651GB free
Firmware: SN17030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 293 297 301 293 317 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 396
Write 352
Mixed 355
SusWrite 299
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 23.4
77% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 285
210% 276 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WPBH32D416SWA-16G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 34.9
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 41.6
SC Mixed 28.6
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 9 60 27.5" 2560 1369 SAM0C4C U28E590
Typical IT12 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Geekom IT12

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback