Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82LN

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics8.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82LN  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory0.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220429
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 08 '24 at 15:46
Run Duration869 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
39.7% Below average
Memory 51.8
1-Core 65.1
2-Core 92.1
42% 69.7 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 209
23% 180 Pts
64-Core 279
17% 279 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3F95) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.19.12.03
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
8.66% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 14
7% 10.6 fps
MRender 21.7
Gravity 9.6
Splatting 11.8
11% 14.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.66%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ256HBJD-00BL2 256GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L2QFXM7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,354
Write 1,173
Mixed 1,144
273% 1,224 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 58.8
198% 69.8 MB/s
DQ Read 782
DQ Write 523
DQ Mixed 637
479% 647 MB/s
Poor: 83% Great: 206%
Seagate Expansion HDD 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 128 128 128 128 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 99.9
Write 121
Mixed 84.1
SusWrite 127
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT40A512M16TB-062E:R 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
50.9% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 17.7
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 17.3
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 26 6 60 15.5" 1536 793 LEN9052
Typical 82LN Builds (Compare 442 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82LN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback