Today's hottest deals

N/A N/A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemN/A N/A  (all builds)
MotherboardN/A N/A
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231011
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '24 at 00:12
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 50.4
1-Core 106
2-Core 214
65% 124 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 761
68% 577 Pts
64-Core 949
59% 949 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 62%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Device(1E50 8015) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.13016.3
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Lighting 13.5
Reflection 13
Parallax 21.2
11% 15.9 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 17.9
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SMI 2263XT 512GB
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0824A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1049 1138 1070 1171 1199 1022 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,776
Write 1,433
Mixed 1,137
SusWrite 1,108
305% 1,363 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 27.6
130% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 699
DQ Write 707
DQ Mixed 474
420% 627 MB/s
Poor: 173%
This bench: 208%
Great: 274%
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
340GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 608 619 617 674 675 681 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GHT16G2666-NB 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.7% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 9.2
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 146
28% 146 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 52 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO76A8
Typical N/A Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: N/A N/A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback