Today's hottest deals

Cyberpowerpc GamingPC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 126%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemCyberpowerpc GamingPC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI
Memory52.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231006
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '24 at 02:52
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900KF-$499
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Memory 73.1
1-Core 235
2-Core 472
131% 260 Pts
4-Core 949
8-Core 1,809
164% 1,379 Pts
64-Core 4316
267% 4316 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 126%
Great: 137%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-S (Super)-$960
Palit(1569 F304) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5750 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 555.85
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 443
Reflection 436
Parallax 512
361% 464 fps
Gravity 387
Splatting 255
275% 321 fps
Poor: 283% Great: 314%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,032
Write 4,118
Mixed 2,824
815% 3,658 MB/s
4K Read 68.1
4K Write 266
4K Mixed 101
373% 145 MB/s
DQ Read 2,083
DQ Write 1,720
DQ Mixed 1,905
1,426% 1,903 MB/s
Poor: 260% Great: 622%
WD Elements 1TB
746GB free, PID 10a8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8.7
Write 15.2
Mixed 8.4
15% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK5X32G2B52C40A2 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
159% Outstanding
MC Read 62.3
MC Write 63.6
MC Mixed 59.7
177% 61.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 51.8
SC Mixed 30
97% 33.8 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 150%
This bench: 159%
Great: 191%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 31.6" 1280 720 DELA24A AW3225QF
Typical GamingPC Builds (Compare 535 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 188%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 244%
UFO

System: Cyberpowerpc GamingPC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $874
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback