Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FA506IV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FA506IV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506IV
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '24 at 15:58
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 64.9
1-Core 57.3
2-Core 114
48% 78.7 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 410
38% 319 Pts
64-Core 597
37% 597 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 1E21) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.14
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 24.5
15% 20.1 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 20.1
Splatting 18.1
14% 16.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1012 1040 894 1045 322 187 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 1,360
Write 1,057
Mixed 968
SusWrite 750
231% 1,034 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 44.1
4K Mixed 36.9
122% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 509
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 264
234% 356 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 156%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 16GB
2400, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
68.3% Good
MC Read 27
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 23.3
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 17.9
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 17: 0P 2R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
17% 12% 42 206 55 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FA506IV Builds (Compare 637 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FA506IV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback