Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 251%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 241%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics251% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240802
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '24 at 09:45
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600-$198
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 81
1-Core 193
2-Core 378
114% 217 Pts
4-Core 670
8-Core 1,084
107% 877 Pts
64-Core 1,340
83% 1,340 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 103%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-TS (Ti-Super)-$800
Device(1771 10DE) ≥ 4GB; RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Twin X2 OC 16GB GDDR6X DLSS3
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
251% Outstanding
Lighting 365
Reflection 374
Parallax 444
297% 394 fps
MRender 491
Gravity 320
Splatting 229
270% 346 fps
Poor: 230%
This bench: 251%
Great: 262%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria G2 SSD 1TB
774GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFA17.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1185 692 694 696 687 690 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1,469
Write 1,646
Mixed 1488
SusWrite 774
303% 1,344 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 64.8
228% 85.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,607
DQ Write 742
DQ Mixed 1,399
978% 1,249 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 229%
Great: 251%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 6400 C32 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
185% Outstanding
MC Read 59.5
MC Write 73.4
MC Mixed 69.7
193% 67.5 GB/s
SC Read 51.7
SC Write 70.7
SC Mixed 59.7
173% 60.7 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 136%
This bench: 185%
Great: 223%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 240 27" 2560 1369 PHLC301 27M2C5500W
Typical TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 116% - Outstanding Total price: $605
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback