Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook Slate T3300KA_T3300KA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Vivobook Slate T3300KA_T3300KA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK T3300KA
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230922
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 04 '24 at 12:26
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N6000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Memory 53.3
1-Core 62.2
2-Core 101
43% 72.3 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 144
18% 135 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1D02) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1273
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 2
0% 1.23 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 2.2
3% 3.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-256G-1002 256GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 202 159 164 157 157 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 538
Write 471
Mixed 394
SusWrite 176
88% 395 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 22.2
4K Mixed 19.5
56% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 62.8
DQ Mixed 78
60% 81.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HCNNNBKMMLXR-NEE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3733 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.7% Below average
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 11.9
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10.5
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 165
24% 165 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 13.3" 1280 720 SDC4169
Typical Vivobook Slate T3300KA_T3300KA Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook Slate T3300KA_T3300KA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback