Today's hottest deals

Asus M52BC_M32BC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus M52BC_M32BC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M52BC_M32BC
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '24 at 21:26
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8310
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 54.5
2-Core 105
45% 74.4 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 318
30% 246 Pts
64-Core 317
20% 317 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Asus(1043 85F1) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.31% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 9
Parallax 10.5
6% 9.17 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 8
Splatting 6.4
6% 7.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.31%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-force 1TB 1TB
589GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1027A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 379 371 382 380 372 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 327
Write 329
Mixed 360
SusWrite 374
79% 348 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 24.7
106% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 42.8
73% 140 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung LO8G1600CL11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
47.1% Average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 17.5
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 11.5
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 26: 0P 5R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
26% 8% 75 169 55 60 24" 1280 720 ACI24C5 VX248
Typical M52BC_M32BC Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M52BC_M32BC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback