Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics63.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 01 '24 at 01:56
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 111
2-Core 224
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 603
63% 503 Pts
64-Core 853
53% 853 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$195
Sapphire(1DA2 E451) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.7.1
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
63.7% Good
Lighting 61.8
Reflection 63.4
Parallax 159
50% 94.7 fps
MRender 75.1
Gravity 88.5
Splatting 148
90% 104 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 93%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ne-512 2280 512GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0808A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 312 320 196 187 171 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 1,594
Write 1,085
Mixed 216
SusWrite 279
174% 794 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 16.1
121% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 699
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 506
380% 516 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 138%
Great: 265%
Plextor PX-256S3C 256GB
89GB free
Firmware: 1.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 183 173 170 169 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 506
Write 470
Mixed 412
SusWrite 182
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 39.1
130% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 256
220% 323 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G M378A1K 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.6% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 27.9
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 25.4
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 22 120 24" 1280 720 LYC0000 XT24NS
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,567 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback