Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NSR_FA617NSR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NSR_FA617NSR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA617NSR
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240206
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateAug 31 '24 at 18:41
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS
FP7r2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 65.1
1-Core 163
2-Core 324
95% 184 Pts
4-Core 596
8-Core 998
97% 797 Pts
64-Core 1,059
66% 1,059 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7600S
Asus(1043 3888) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.40.22.07
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 168
Parallax 195
94% 159 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 124
Splatting 194
143% 173 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 108%
Great: 104%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-1002 512GB
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73101000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,233
Write 2050
Mixed 1,643
440% 1,975 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 40.8
155% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 835
DQ Write 372
DQ Mixed 859
569% 689 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 465%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4PB0-CWMOL 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.1% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 20.6
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 19.4
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 165 16" 1280 720 BOE0B33 NE160WUM-NX2
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NSR_FA617NSR Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NSR_FA617NSR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback