Today's hottest deals

Monster TULPAR T7 V20.8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V20.8  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V20.8
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240111
Uptime1 Days
Run DateAug 30 '24 at 14:42
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 67
1-Core 184
2-Core 362
105% 204 Pts
4-Core 680
8-Core 1,201
113% 941 Pts
64-Core 1,770
110% 1,770 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
Device(1D05 1295) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 32.0.15.6094
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 199
Parallax 138
149% 173 fps
MRender 210
Gravity 117
Splatting 96
110% 141 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 129%
Great: 129%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-PX600-500-80 500GB
307GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFMC1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,704
Write 1,760
Mixed 1426
364% 1,630 MB/s
4K Read 51.4
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 70.1
235% 82.7 MB/s
DQ Read 978
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 784
542% 690 MB/s
Poor: 116% Great: 323%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Wilk Elektronik S.A. GR3200S464L22/16G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.1% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 16.3
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 12.9
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 17.2" 1920 1009 CMN1774
Typical TULPAR T7 V20.8 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V20.8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback