Today's hottest deals

Asus F1A75-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus F1A75-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120116
Uptime8.8 Days
Run DateAug 29 '24 at 17:01
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3650 APU
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
49.7% Average
Memory 74.1
1-Core 40.3
2-Core 79.6
43% 64.7 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 145
20% 147 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6530D
Asus(1043 84C8) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
2.67% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 2.9
2% 3.53 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.67%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 240GB
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFME1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 45 90 86 52 108 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.3% Poor
Read 150
Write 99.3
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 83.1
23% 105 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 24
4K Mixed 9.1
49% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 15.6
DQ Write 24.3
DQ Mixed 11.5
11% 17.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 GR1600D364L11/8G 10GB
1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.2% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 7.1
23% 7.97 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 0P 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 33% 3 64 20 75 23.8" 1920 1057 LEN67A2 D24-40
Typical F1A75-V PRO Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-V PRO - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $213
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback