Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PO7-650

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 181%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 224%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PO7-650  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator PO7-650 New
Memory22 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221207
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 28 '24 at 15:05
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700KF-$280
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 73.2
1-Core 230
2-Core 428
125% 244 Pts
4-Core 859
8-Core 1,743
153% 1,301 Pts
64-Core 3,082
191% 3,082 Pts
Poor: 121%
This bench: 117%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$1,007
Acer(1025 A702) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 560.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
156% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 429
Parallax 503
97% 350 fps
MRender 550
Gravity 372
Splatting 267
310% 397 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 156%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,072
Write 3,565
Mixed 2694
765% 3,444 MB/s
4K Read 70.3
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 101
330% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,542
DQ Write 1,209
DQ Mixed 1,384
1,033% 1,378 MB/s
Poor: 196% Great: 540%
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 PRO 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3372 3375 3359 3377 3317 2339 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
476% Outstanding
Read 2,804
Write 3,337
Mixed 2,951
SusWrite 3,190
695% 3,070 MB/s
4K Read 75.2
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 107
325% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,666
DQ Write 1,339
DQ Mixed 1,499
1,123% 1,501 MB/s
Poor: 237%
This bench: 476%
Great: 528%
Asmt 2235 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 435 458 464 459 471 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 477
Write 466
Mixed 417
SusWrite 456
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 34.3
108% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 202
145% 185 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 80%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$52
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OAD50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 186 187 187 188 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 175
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 186
100% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
142% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM2V48UCSV1-BFFS 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
143% Outstanding
MC Read 58.6
MC Write 55.9
MC Mixed 53.5
160% 56 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 47.1
SC Mixed 22.1
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 130%
This bench: 143%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 120 72.3" 1280 720 GSMC0C8 LG TV SSCR2
Typical Predator PO7-650 Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 443%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 526%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PO7-650

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $2,015
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback