Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAMD
MotherboardAMD A520
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '24 at 23:13
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$161
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 80.5
1-Core 171
2-Core 343
105% 198 Pts
4-Core 680
8-Core 1,115
110% 898 Pts
64-Core 1,616
100% 1,616 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 104%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 11C7) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 18.6
14% 18.3 fps
MRender 15.4
Gravity 18.8
Splatting 16.6
14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MV240GB 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0411A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 69 64 71 75 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 406
Write 90.5
Mixed 54.1
SusWrite 73.8
34% 156 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 13.4
97% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 22.8
58% 123 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 93%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$34
43GB free
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 112 31 16 7.2 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 460
Write 206
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 61.1
40% 187 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 24
4K Mixed 12.4
56% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 73.8
DQ Write 76.5
DQ Mixed 32.2
36% 60.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HKED4161CAB2F2HB1 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 15.8
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.8
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 2 60 72.3" 1360 768 GSM0001 LG TV SSCR2
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback