Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82SC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82SC  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240410
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 21 '24 at 20:57
Run Duration81 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
FP7, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 73.3
1-Core 167
2-Core 323
99% 188 Pts
4-Core 613
8-Core 961
97% 787 Pts
64-Core 1,116
69% 1,116 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050 (Laptop)
Legend(17AA 3AF8) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.10.24.02
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.9% Above average
Lighting 73.3
Reflection 95.5
Parallax 60.1
60% 76.3 fps
MRender 72.5
Gravity 58.7
Splatting 59.6
52% 63.6 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg50znt512g LS KIOXIA 512GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0107ANLS
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,230
Write 1,833
Mixed 1,571
417% 1,878 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 49.1
172% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,080
DQ Write 508
DQ Mixed 920
649% 836 MB/s
Poor: 102% Great: 307%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Goodram GR4800S564L40S/16G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
124% Outstanding
MC Read 45.2
MC Write 50.6
MC Mixed 42.1
131% 46 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 49.8
SC Mixed 31.9
101% 35.5 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 112%
This bench: 124%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 165 16" 1536 960 LEN9153
Typical 82SC Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Lenovo 82SC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback