Today's hottest deals

Asrock H310CM-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H310CM-HDV  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190514
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 21 '24 at 15:59
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$83
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 187
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 503
54% 429 Pts
64-Core 495
31% 495 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
Nvidia(10DE 2188) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 560.81
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.3% Average
Lighting 54.6
Reflection 54.1
Parallax 50.4
44% 53 fps
MRender 61.9
Gravity 47.8
Splatting 43.6
41% 51.1 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingmax 480GB 480GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN4763
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 40 12 17 41 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 463
Write 440
Mixed 379
SusWrite 45.3
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 43.2
150% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 222
171% 229 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD416G266681 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
39.4% Below average
MC Read 16
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 11.7
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 10.1
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 45: 0P 4R 2G 19B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
45% 19% 131 272 15 60 23.5" 1920 1080 AOC2470 2470W
Typical H310CM-HDV Builds (Compare 4,095 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $260
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback