Today's hottest deals

AZW EQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAZW EQ  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW EQ
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '24 at 23:46
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 70.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 200
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 357
48% 357 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5186
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
3.35% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 7
Parallax 4.3
3% 5 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 6
Splatting 3.1
4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.35%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
512gb SSD 512GB
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN16525
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 391 389 395 390 398 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 413
Write 418
Mixed 416
SusWrite 396
93% 411 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 42.4
150% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 272
199% 258 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 230%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G56C46S5.M8G1 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.2% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 25.2
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 19.4
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27" 1280 720 GSM5A5B 27MP35
Typical EQ Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: AZW EQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback